Unique depositing wallets
| Casino | Unique depositing wallets | Share of tracked wallets |
|---|---|---|
| 1,624,450 | 40.6% | |
| 293,608 | 7.3% | |
| 237,802 | 5.9% | |
| 189,193 | 4.7% | |
| 160,159 | 4.0% | |
| 158,319 | 4.0% | |
| 156,240 | 3.9% | |
| 141,548 | 3.5% | |
| BitStarz | 122,620 | 3.1% |
| 84,936 | 2.1% | |
| Vave | 77,399 | 1.9% |
| 54,621 | 1.4% | |
| 52,859 | 1.3% | |
| 47,798 | 1.2% | |
| 45,809 | 1.1% | |
| 42,987 | 1.1% | |
| 42,964 | 1.1% | |
| 42,856 | 1.1% | |
| 35,446 | 0.9% | |
| 34,696 | 0.9% | |
| 33,362 | 0.8% | |
| 31,197 | 0.8% | |
| 26,788 | 0.7% | |
| 26,487 | 0.7% | |
| 24,123 | 0.6% |
A wallet is not a person. One player can fund several wallets and one wallet can be shared, so read these as a measure of on-chain reach rather than a headcount. Lifetime totals, so an older operator accumulates more regardless of current activity.
Lifetime totals across the wallets we track. Two cautions before reading anything into the order.
A wallet is not a person. One player can fund several wallets, and a wallet can be shared or belong to a service. These figures measure on-chain reach rather than headcount.
Lifetime totals also favour age. An operator trading for five years accumulates wallets an operator trading for one cannot, regardless of which is busier today. For current activity, our flows page covers the last seven days.
What concentration tells you
The distribution is heavily top-weighted, with the largest operator holding roughly a quarter of all tracked depositing wallets. That is normal for a market with strong network effects: liquidity attracts players, and players attract liquidity.
For a player, scale cuts both ways. A larger operator has more to lose from public misconduct and more capacity to absorb a bad run. It is also less likely to notice or care about an individual dispute.
Nothing in this table measures how any of these operators treat the wallets funding them.